Skip to Main Content
New England College of Optometry Logo LIBRARY

Evidence-Based Optometry

Predatory Publishers

Most open access (OA) journals abide by some set of rigorous criteria, such as the membership criteria set forth by the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA). However, there are other OA journals that do not publish reputable work and are considered "predatory," meaning they only exist to exploit researchers and collect author fees.*

Predatory journals can often be difficult to distinguish from reputable OA journals, and some bogus publishers have been getting increasingly sophisticated. There are some red flags to look out for, however, which are detailed in the handout below.

* Note that an author fee alone is not an indication that a journal is predatory.  Because OA journals are not typically funded by the standard publishing model of subscription sales and/or advertisements, they are often reliant upon author fees (after peer review and/or acceptance) to cover publication costs. This has become a widely accepted publishing model in the past decade or so.

Library Home | College Home | NECO Canvas |

©2024, New England College of Optometry Library
424 Beacon St., Boston, MA 02115
[email protected]


Borrow Materials

Request an Item

Renew an Item

Off-Campus Access

Get Help from a Librarian

Data Management

Journal Club Portal

Citing & Copyright

Find Grants

Avoid Predatory Publishers

Research Impact Tools

Learn a Language


Library Catalog





Drug References

Images for Reuse

Patient Education

Course Reserves

Poster Resources

Subject Guides

Search Print Collection

Boards Resources

Master's Theses

Evidence-Based Optometry

Clinical Cases

Clinical Reasoning Tutorials

Visible Body 3D Anatomy (web)

Visible Body 3D Anatomy (mobile app)

Acland Video Atlas of Human Anatomy: Vol. 4, Head and Neck

EyeDock (free version)


Reserve a Space


Study Elsewhere


Library Mission

Library Staff

College Archives

OD Program InfoLit Plan

Contact Us